Advertisement

Customize

The · Mousehole


Reality & Filmity

Recent Entries · Archive · Friends · User Info

* * *
This was a cute, short article I read this morning.  It's quite an interesting social experiment.  The penultimate paragraph made me chuckle:

"The journey of the fragile robots was documented and video footage shows a variety of helpers, from those only willing to use their feet to guide the creatures along, to girls who crouched down to inspect and help the robots on their way, to a man who said out loud "You can't go that way, it's toward the road."

But it also made me think.  The man's reaction - did that come from an instinctive connection with this humanoid (albeit angular) robot, or did it come from increasing exposure to film and literature where humans and robots/androids/mechanoids communicate relatively effortlessly?  Certainly, it could have been a reflexive action.  After all, we talk to our pets and half the time they've got no idea what we're going on about, gauging our moods from our tone of voice and reacting to that.

Current Mood:
pensive pensive

Previous Entry · Leave a comment · Add to Memories · Tell a Friend · Next Entry

* * *
[User Picture]
On June 7th, 2009 12:58 am (UTC), [info]sinick commented:
What a fascinating study! Thank you so much for the link!

I was surprised that all of the robots successfully reached their destinations, but clearly that success (and people's positive reactions) is due to several cues:
1: Anthopomorphism - even a crude humanoid shape helps. The smiley face would have helped a lot more.
2: Cuteness / Harmlessness / Helplessness - the small size and obvious fragility both hook into nurturing instincts, evolved to protect small children, and these days generalised to pets.
3: Lack of monetary value - If they were Shiny Metal robots with lots of pretty Blinkenlights, I bet at least one would've been stolen, even if they were hitting cues 1 and 2 hard.

As for the man's reaction, my vote's for the 'reflexive' explanation. Your talking to pets analogy is spot-on. Another generalisation of a reaction originally evolved for infants.



Edited at 2009-06-07 01:04 am (UTC)
* * *
[User Picture]
On June 7th, 2009 02:24 am (UTC), [info]constantine2530 commented:
psss, you're so right about the pets. I've been telling the same stuff to my cat for more than 6 years and she doesn't get the message xD It all depends on the tone of my voice and my body language :3

The article was so cute. But it's ironic how ppl will help a robot but won't help a human the same way xD I bet that if I was lost in such a big city it would be more difficult to find somebody to help me than this robot :/

[User Picture]
On June 7th, 2009 04:25 am (UTC), [info]sinick replied:
'More difficult to find somebody to help me' is a bit tricky to judge. It's a ratio between 'people who were asked for help and did' vs. 'people who were asked for help and didn't'. Even if we define 'people who were asked for help' in this case as those who were close enough to read the robot's flag, there's no way of knowing how many thousands of people _didn't_ help the robots.

As for not getting help in a big city, sometimes you can get help when you're not even asking for it. When I was in London last I was walking around town, seeing the sights. I'd paused to take a quick look at a map. I wasn't worried at all, just estimating how long it'd take me to walk to where I was going, when this terribly nice bloke spotted me looking at the map and asked if I was lost and could he tell me how to get to where I wanted to go? Really couldn't be nicer, and not at all in a creepy stalkery way.

And people were similarly helpful on the New York subway, when I actually was lost.

Yeah, there are some right bastards out there. But they're not in the majority, not even in the biggest cities in the world. If they were, the cities would collapse.

* * *

Previous Entry · Leave a comment · Add to Memories · Tell a Friend · Next Entry

Advertisement

Customize